작성일 : 18-01-04 11:15
|
[K-Usher1] 20180104 K1 연정현 수업정리
|
|
|
글쓴이 :
연정현 (183.♡.53.158)
 조회 : 739  추천 : 0
|
|
|
In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with privatization to debate whether infrastructure privatization benefits both the state and the private business The reading passage is providing three pieces of evidence to prove its point, whereas the lecturer argues against it by providing three compelling rebuttals.
The reading passage asserts the idea that infrastructure privatization increases profits for the state since private companies have a great incentive to produce better goods and services. A public organization would not be as productive because of the limits of the government’s budget. The professor casts doubt because over the long-term it is a lose to state. The provides an example of toll booth
The reading claims that another reason privatization is advantageous is that private businesses tend to consistently monitor the infrastructure they worked on. On the other hand, if the government were in charge of monitoring, it would not e as efficient since the government has many other issues to deal with. The professor refutes the idea because the companies do not have interest maintaining services rather than gaining profits. The professor provides and example of revoking license to a water corporation
The reading points out that the private business is likely to introduce new technology while the government will not. As better technologies are incorporated in public services, both private business and the state benefits since improved public service will, again, attract more people, which results in even greater tax revenue. The professor challenges the idea because only in competitive environment, companies provide better services. If there was no competition, there were no reasons for companies to introduce new technologies.
글자수: 768자
|
|
Total 14,056
|
select * from g4_write_cls_twe where wr_is_comment = 0 order by wr_num, wr_reply limit 30, 15
> board
