작성일 : 18-01-04 11:16
|
[K-Usher1] 20180104 K1 유진혁 수업정리
|
|
|
글쓴이 :
유진혁 (183.♡.53.158)
 조회 : 1,525  추천 : 0
|
|
|
In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with privatization to debate whether infrastructure privatization benefits both state and the private business. The reading passage is providing three pieces of evidence to prove its point, whereas the lecturer argues against it by providing three compelling rebuttals.
The reading passage asserts the idea that Infrastructure privatization increases profits for the state since private companies have a great incentive to produce better goods and services. A public organization would not be as productive because of the limits of the government's budget. The professor casts doubt because privatization is a loss to the state over the long term. The professor provides an example of Chicago toll booth.
The reading claims that private businesses tend to consistently monitor the infrastructure they worked on. If the government were in charge of monitoring, it would not be as efficient since the government has many other issues to deal with. The professor refutes the idea because private businesses are not interested in maintain services because they don’t want to use extra money. The professor provides an example of revoking license to a water cooperation
The reading points out that the private business is likely to introduce new technology while the government will not. As better technologies are incorporated in public services, both private business and the state benefit since improved public service will, again, attract more people, which results in even greater tax revenue. The professor challenges the idea because they produces better services only in the presence of a competitive environment. So if there is no competition, there’s no reason for a private company to spend time on introducing new technology.
글자수: 775자
|
|
Total 14,054
|
select * from g4_write_cls_twe where wr_is_comment = 0 order by wr_num, wr_reply limit 15, 15
> board
