ÀÛ¼ºÀÏ : 18-01-04 11:13
[K-Usher1] 20180104 K1 ¹è¹Î°æ ¼ö¾÷Á¤¸®
|
|
±Û¾´ÀÌ :
¹è¹Î°æ (183.¢½.53.158)
Á¶È¸ : 1,174 Ãßõ : 0
|
|
ÅëÇÕÇü
ÀÎÆ®·Î ¹®´Ü
In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with __privatization_____ to debate whether ____infrastructure privatization benefits both state and the private business. The reading passage is providing three pieces of evidence to prove its point, whereas the lecturer argues against it by providing three compelling rebuttals.
µÎ ¹ø° ¹®´Ü
The reading passage asserts the idea that _______infrastructure privatization increases profits for the state since private companies have a great incentive to produce better goods and services_________. A public organization, however, would not be as productive because of the limits of the government¡¯s budget. The professor casts doubt because ____over the long-term it is loss. The professor provides an example of Chicago toll booth.
¼¼ ¹ø° ¹®´Ü
The reading passage claims that _______private businesses tend to consistently monitor the infrastructure they worked on. On the other hand, if the government were in charge of monitoring, it would not be as efficient since the government has many other issues to deal with______. The professor refutes the idea because ________(¸®½º´× Àüü)____________
³× ¹ø° ¹®´Ü
The reading passage points out that ________the private business is likely to introduce new technology while the government will not. As better technologies are incorporated in public services, both private business and the state benefit _______. The professor challenges the idea because _____(¸®½º´× Àüü)______.
±ÛÀÚ¼ö: 655.5ÀÚ
|
|
Total 14,054
|
select * from g4_write_cls_twe where wr_is_comment = 0 order by wr_num, wr_reply limit 30, 15