작성일 : 18-01-04 11:13
|
[K-Usher1] 20180104 K1 김세일 수업정리
|
|
|
글쓴이 :
김세일 (183.♡.53.158)
 조회 : 1,474  추천 : 0
|
|
|
통합형
인트로 문단
In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with privatization to debate whether infrastructure privatization benefits both the state and the private business. The reading passage is providing three pieces of evidence to prove its point, whereas the lecturer argues against it by providing three compelling rebuttals.
두 번째 문단
The reading passage asserts the idea that private companies have a great incentive to produce better goods and services. A public organization, however, would not be as productive because of the limits of the government’s budget. The professor casts doubt because over the long-term it is a loss. The professor provides an example of Chicago toll booth.
세 번째 문단
The reading claims that private businesses tend to consistently monitor the infrastructure they worked on. On the other hand, if the government were in charge of monitoring, it would not be as efficient since the government has many other issues to deal with. The professor refutes the idea because the private companies do not have interest of investing the professor provides an example of revoking
네 번째 문단
The reading points out that the private business is likely to introduce new technology while the government will not. As better technologies are incorporated in public services, both private business and the state benefit since improved public service will, again, attract more people, which result in even greater tax revenue. The professor challenges the idea because the private companies will introduce new technology only in competitive environment.
룰 5개
1. 50%~66% 를 베껴라(?)
2. 근거를 베낀다.
3. 예시를 베끼지 않는다.
4. 근거와 내용이 겹치지 않는 문장을 적는다.
5. 4번과 같은 내용이 나오는 글이 있을경우에는 먼저 적힌 문장을 는다
글자수: 766자
|
|
Total 14,054
|
select * from g4_write_cls_twe where wr_is_comment = 0 order by wr_num, wr_reply limit 30, 15
> board
