작성일 : 18-01-04 11:11
|
[K-Usher1] 20180104 K1 김성현 수업정리
|
|
|
글쓴이 :
김성현 (183.♡.53.158)
 조회 : 1,874  추천 : 0
|
|
|
In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with privatization to debate infrastructure privatization benefits both the state and the private business. The reading passage is providing three pieces of evidence to prove its point, whereas the lecturer argues against it by providing three compelling rebuttals.
The reading passage asserts the idea that infrastructure privatization increases profits for the state since private companies have a great incentive to produce better goods and services. However, a public organization would not be as productive because of the limits of the government's budget. The professor casts doubt because over the long-term it is a loss. The professor provides an example of Chicago toll booth.
The reading claims that private business tend to consistently monitor the infrastructure they worked on. On the other hand, if the government were in charge of monitoring, it would not be as efficient since the government has many other issues to deal with. The professor refutes the idea because they do not interest in maintaining services.The professor provides an example of revoking license to water cooperation.
The reading points out that the private business is likely to introduce new technology while the government will not. As better technologies are incorporated in public service, both private business and the state benefit since improved public service will, again, attract more people, which results in even greater tax revenue. The professor challenges the idea because _____(리스닝 전체)______
글자수: 677.5자
|
|
Total 14,054
|
select * from g4_write_cls_twe where wr_is_comment = 0 order by wr_num, wr_reply limit 45, 15
> board
