작성일 : 16-07-29 00:13
|
글쓴이 :
윤자현 (59.♡.34.42)
 조회 : 1,595  추천 : 0
|
|
|
I disagree with the statement that government should ban advertisements of plastic surgery. Government doesn't have responsibility to do that rather than have responsibility to protect the freedom of the expression. Besides, if ban on advertisement is purposed on reducing the rate people getting it, it would be ineffective as people would get information through word-of-mouth. In fact, plastic surgeries are not malevolent. If people don't addict to plastic surgery, through it, people can increase in self-esteem of individuals so that live a more confidential and satisfying life. There is no need government to entice people to do that, but should not ban the advertisements.
I disagree with the statement that famous entertainers and athletes should be granted more privacy than now. Both the groups of people, entertainers and athletes, especially the former, work for getting more popularity and they are paid based on their popularity. The more being exposed to the public, the more chance they become famous. For example, a mumblecore was reported his dilettante life, volunteer works, in public.Then he obtained role in hit movie, entering a stardom. I was also shocked by the usage of media. What I want to clarify is that being secluded would never help celebrities in work. Besides, popularity is transient. If they want to keep the current situation, being famous, they have to continually show them to the crowd rather than isolate themselves.
글자수: 623.5자
|
|
Total 200
|
select * from g4_write_spk_brain where wr_is_comment = 0 order by wr_num, wr_reply limit 75, 15
> board
