In the given set of materials, the reading passage and lecture deal with the glasses which can cause birds being injured. Reading passages provide three possible way to prevent birds from being injured, whereas the lecture refutes the reading passage by giving three compelling reasons.

    The lecturer claims that birds cannot be prevented from being injured by means of one-way glass since it acts as a mirror. And this is just as bad as regular glass. Birds do not understand the concept of the mirror and they will be puzzled by this. For example, birds will fly right into the reflections because they think the sky and the tree seen on the glass is virtual. So it is difficult to say that one-way glass can prevent birds from injury.

    Lecturer stands against the opinion posed on the reading regarding the colorful design of the glasses. Indeed, by coloring glasses, it can prevent birds from being injured. However, coloring and patterning should be very narrow because birds can perceive those opening as a hole and attempts to fly through. However, if those openings are narrow enough, it can adversely affect the occupants by dimming inside the building. Therefore, this challenges the point made in the reading passage that colorful design can prevent birds from being injured and people maintain their quality of life.

    Lecturer agrees with the idea that birds use magnetic field as to navigate their pathways. However, this only applies to the long distance such as during bird migration. Lecturer points out that birds are rather using eyes and brightness as to guide their way for short distance. They do not use magnetic sensibility to move within the city.

    To sum up, different types of glasses described in the reading passages are not efficient way to prevent birds from injury. Lecturer clearly poses her opinion and refutes each evidence described in reading passages one by one.

First, the professor argues that one-way glass is just as bad as regular glass, since they act as a mirror. Birds do not understand the concept of mirror. As a result, the birds might fly into the reflection of the sky or tree. This refutes the point made in the reading passage that one-way glass will prevent birds from being injured.

Next, the lecturer claims that the colorful stripes and designs of glass are also dangerous for birds. It is true that people can see out through the openings, but the birds are likely to perceive those as open holes and try to fly through them. To prevent this matter, the unprinted parts should be extremely small, which makes the room dark for the people inside the building. This point opposes the reading passage that colorful designs help birds avoid the glass and be encouraged to be a general design for architects.

Lastly, the professor points out that even though birds do navigate by sensing magnetic field, it is only used in long-distance travels, such as moving from one country to another. The birds use their eyes and light in order to navigate short-distance. So, the magnetic field will have no effect on birds avoiding the glass. This challenges the idea of the reading passage that artificial magnetic field will guide the birds away from the building.

In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with several solutions for the bird’s injuries from hitting glasses. The reading passage emphasizes that bird injuries from flying through the buildings could be prevented in three ways whereas the lecture argues against the reading passage by providing three compelling reasons.
First of all, the lecture points out that replacing glass with one-way glass has a serious problem. Since birds do not understand the concept of mirror, one-way glass is as bad as regular mirror. For example, reflections from sky or tree on the glass can fraud birds to fly through the glass. This is challenged by the reading passage that one-way glass can provide a solid barrier for birds not to fly through the building.
Next, the lecturer claims that the opening from colorful designs deceives birds to consider it as a hole to pass and fly through. If openings are made extremely small, it can prevent bird’s collision but can result in the darkness of the inside of buildings. So, it is difficult to say that colorful designs avoid bird collision while encouraging general designs to architects.
Finally, it is true that birds use magnetic field to navigate. However, they only use magnetic field to travel long distance like from warm place to cold. Rather, birds use their eye to detect lights and brightness to travel short distance. This is refuted by the reading passage that artificial magnetic field can guide birds and steer directions.

In the given set of material, the reading passage and the lecture deal with the problem that the glass is dangerous for wild bird. The reading passage provides solutions for problem whereas the lecture argues against it by three compelling reasons.
/
 First of all, the lecturer points out that one-way glass is also make the problem as bad as regular glass to birds. Because the birds can not understand the mirror which just reflect other things, it can not solve the harmful effect. If the one-way glass reflects the sky and the trees, the birds may fly right into the glass. So, it is difficult to say that replacing the regular glass to one-way glass is the solution for problem.
/
 Second, the lecturer argues that the colorful stipe design make the open hall on glass. So, birds may still fly right through the glass. If stripe design is made extreme small on glass to prevent from open-hall effect, it can make space inside the building too dark. This refutes the point made in the reading passage that alternative design on regular glass prevents birds from fly through into the glass.
/
 Finally, the lecturer claim that even if birds use magnetic field in navigating fly, it does only in fairly long distance. Birds, however, use the eye sight and the light for comparatively short trip. So, creating artificial magnetic field which is intended to navigate the birds right direction will not have much effect.

In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecturer deal with solutions that responsible businesses can use to keep birds from injuries. The reading passage provides three solutions which are one-way glass, colorful design, and magnetic fields, whereas the lecture argues against the reading passage with three compelling rebuttals.

First, the professor points out surface of one-way glass reflects like mirror. It is as bad as regular glass for birds because they do not understand mirror. They will flight right into one-way glass when they see reflections of trees or sky. This challenges the point made in the reading passage that one-way glass is one solution.

Secondly, the lecturer states that colorful designs make birds perceive it as open hole. When birds falsely recognize, they flight through the hole. After an intervention which decorates with color, also, portion of glass without coloring is decreased. It is too dark for people inside the building to see outside. This refutes the reading passage's claim that colorful design in building can solve the problem.

Finally, the professor argues that birds only use the ability to detect magnetic field during very long travel such as winter season when migratory birds move from cold regions to warm regions. Compared to long travel, birds use both eyes and sensibility of light's brightness during short travel. Therefore magnetic fields do not have much effect on changing the birds' route. This refutes the reading passage's claim that it is effective.

The professor argues that one-way glass is just bad as regular glass since they act as a mirror. And birds do not understand the concept of mirror. Birds might fly into the reflection of the sky or tree, for example. And this refutes the point made in the reading passage that one-way glass will prevent birds from being injured.

 Next, the professor claims that buildings with colorful lines or designs are also dangerous to birds. They can perceive vacant spaces between stripes as a hole and try to fly through. To prevent those problems, open space from colorful lines or designs should be extremely small but will makes indoor room dark.

 Lastly, the professor points out that birds use their magnetic fields only they fly long distances like migration to cold area to warm area. Birds use their eyes when they travel short distances. So, it is difficult to say that an artificial magnetic held to guide birds away from buildings.

In the given set of materials the reading passage and the lecture deal with protection of the birds from the glass. The reading passages provides that three reasons about the glass, whereas the lecture argues against it by providing three compelling rebuttals.

First, the lecturer points out that reflection of one-way glass is as bad as the regular glass. Because of that, birds cannot understand the reflection of one-way glass. So, if they see the reflection which is tree or sky, they just fly right through to there.  This challenges the reading passage that birds cannot see through the one-way glass.

Second, the professor in the lecture refutes that the colorful glass also makes a problem. In the colorful glass, there are open holes to make people to see the outdoor. But, the holes in the glass makes the birds fly right through to them. And also, it is extremely small to see through the holes. So, it cause the dark room. This challenges the reading passage that birds avoid the stripped window

Third, the lecturer cast doubt that although magnetic field makes the migrate-bird to fly right direction where they want to go, it can be only adjusted to birds that travel long distance. The birds that fly short trip doesn't have much effect that related to magnetic field. So, the magnetic field won't have much effect to bird that living near cities. This challenges that the magnetic field can guide the right direction to birds.

In the given set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with the glass windows are bad for birds due to unable to distinguish between glass and open air. The reading passage emphasizes that several solutions to prevent injuries to birds due to unable to distinguish between glass and open air, whereas the lecture argues against the reading passage by providing three compelling reasons.
The professor argues that one-way glass is just bad as regular glass because of being like a mirror. Because birds do not understand mirror, the birds would fly right into the reflection of the sky or tree. This refutes the point made in the reading passage that they will understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and will not try to fly through it.

The professor claims that the colorful stripe designs of glass allow birds to fly through the open hall on glass, whereas the unprinted parts of glass is so extremely small that the room would be too dark for the people inside the building. This opposes the point made in the passage that the colorful stripe designs of glass help birds avoid the glass and is encouraged to be a general design for architects.

The professor points out that although birds do navigate by detecting magnetic field, magnetic field is only for long distance travels, such as migration. By using eyes and brightness of light, the birds travel in short-distance like onside city to another. The magnetic field would not have much effect for avoiding the glass. This challenges the idea of the reading passage that artificial magnetic field help to guide the birds away from the building.