The professor argues that people should pay hidden coast associated with planting genetically modified trees than much more it sees. People cannot collect the seed for free. By law, people should pay the company everytime they plant. And this idea refutes the point made in the reading passage that genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits.

The lecturer also states that planting genetically modified plants makes even more damages for local wild trees. Genetically modified plants tend to grow more aggressively. Because they are planted among natural trees, genetically modified plants out compete with native trees for resources such as sunlight, soil nutrient, and water. And this idea refutes the point made in the reading passage that the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees

Moreover, the professor is pointing out the hidden cost of genetic modification. Firms charge extra cost for genetically modified plants, and also require additional payment whenever farmers seed the plants. This challenges the reading passage that is claiming genetically modified plants yields better return for farmers.

Last, according to the professor, genetically modified plants hurt local wild trees. Modified trees grow more aggressively, and take resources from natural trees. Therefore, modified trees will crowd out unmodified trees. This casts doubt on the reading passage arguing that the technic can be used to save the native trees.

Second, The professor argues that companies require much more money when farmers plant genetically modified trees.He says that farmers cannot collect trees for free. By law, farmers should pay the company everytime they plant genetically modified trees. This is in opposition to the reading passage that genetically modified trees give farmers economic benefits.

Third, the professor claims that genetically modified trees would have more damage to wild trees. He argues that they grow more aggressively and would outcompete for resources such as soil, nutirition, sunlight, and water. Eventually, they would exist more than the natural trees. This refutes the reading passage that genetically modified trees prevent overeploitation of wild trees.

Second, lecturer claims about hidden cause about economic aspects of genetically modified trees. When farmers attempt to grow genetically modified trees, it can cause that more expensive than trees in wild. Farmers should buy new seeds everytime when growing trees. This argument is against of the point made in reading passage that genetically modified trees would provide economic benefits with farmers.

Finally, genetically modified trees can be harmful for other wild trees. Genetically modified trees are more likely to grow aggressively than natural ones. They will take much more resources like sunlight, soil than natural trees. Eventually, natural trees would damaged by genetically modified trees. This statement refutes that the point of the reading passage that genetically modified trees would prevent the native ones for survival.

Next, the lecturer claims that genetically modified trees can cost a large amount of money on the farmers. After the trees have grown enough, the farmers cannot collect the seeds and plant in for free. They have to pay the company every time they plant. This argument refutes the reading passage’s point that planting genetically modified trees leads to economic benefits.

Lastly, the lecture argues that the genetically modified trees can significantly damage other unmodified trees. Genetically modified trees tend to grow much more aggressively than native trees. They hinder the native trees to receive sunlight and to grow properly. As a result, genetically modified trees end up crowding out the native trees. This idea claims doubt on the point the writer made, that genetically modified trees can save the native trees.

The lecturer think that genetically modified tress is not economical. Farmers have to pay whenever they plant genetically modified plants to the company by law. In nature, farmers don’t have to pay this money, they just plant it for free. This shows that the idea presented in the reading passage that planting genetically modified trees has economic benefit can be refuted.

In the lecture the professor said that the genetically modified plants can cause damage on the local wild plants. Since the genetically modified plants grow faster and aggressively they use more natural elements such as sun, water, soil nutrition. In the competition of the genetically modified plants and unmodified plants, genetically modified plants can ruin the mechanism of nature. Therefore, this against the statement of reading passage that wild plants protect wild plants.

Next, the professor also states that it will cost more than natural plants. When the farmers want to buy genetically modified plants, there will be cost. In addition to that, when they harvest their results, it is not free of charge. They need to pay to company for every single plants by law. The farmers not only have to pay for plants but also need to give royalties to company. This is in opposition to the reading passage that growing genetically modified plants brings economic benefits.
Finally, the speaker argues that there will be even more damage to unmodified plants. Modified plants are designed to grow aggressively. They are often planted with natural plants and this is the reason why the typical plants are in danger. Because the genetically modified plants absorb more sunlight and soil energies than others, unmodified plants will lose in competition. It could lead to extinction of natural plants. This refutes the reading passage which states that overexploitation of nature plants could be prevented through planting genetically modified plants.

Second, the professor casts doubt on the reading passage by claiming that genetically modified trees have a hind cost associated with other companies. According to the law farmers have to pay the company every time they plant a seed. So, it is more expensive for the farmers than planting a natural tree. This idea refutes the point made in the reading passage that genetically modified tress bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them.

Lastly, the lecturer says that genetically modified tress would cause more damage to local wild trees. Since, they grow more aggressively they will outcompete the native trees for resources such as, sunlight and water. Therefore, this would crowd out the natural environment. This idea is against the point made in the reading passage that genetically modified trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees.

Secondarily, the professor insists that it can not be the economical benefits. Genetically modified trees cost much more than it sees. Farmer should pay the company everytime they plant because they can not collect the seed. Therefore it can not be the benefit on the aspect of economy in fact.

Finally, the professor argues that it can not save the local trees. Genetically modified trees spread quickly and need same amount of resources. It becomes to compete on the resources such as water, nutrients in the soil. Therefore, nonmodified trees cannot help being damaged by the genetically modified trees.

Second, genetic modified plant requires hiden cost. Whenever genetic modified plant is used, the farmer should pay for money to the company which produces genetic modified plant. Thus, using genetic modified plant would does not make vast profit for the farmer. This refutes the reading passage that the farmer get the vast return via genetic modified plant.
Third, genetic modified plant can be damage of surviving the natural plant. When genetic modified plant lives with the natural plant at same place, the natural plant should compete water, nutrient and resource for growing well along with genetic modified plant. Thus, this would cause the natural plant difficult to grow well. This is in opposition to the reading passage that genetic modified plant help prevent the overexploitation of the natural plant.